Wednesday, July 12, 2023

I Am A Black Farmer*

 Sometimes the best way to describe how one feels and thinks is via music, lyrics, and a tune that sticks in your head. Here is a song that has been with me for quite a while. I hope you'll appreciate the words. They came to me a while back while driving down the road. I was driving. I asked my wife to drive so I could write them down. Admittedly, I am not the Black farmer. I am the farmer's friend and advocate. These are words and music to stories I have heard since 1994. The notion of a white guy writing a poem/song about Black farmers still knocks me off balance; however, this is what I heard and those words are from the stories they entrusted to me. 

I Am A Black Farmer*

I am a farmer, 
You can plainly see;
Yes, my skin is Black,
Black as I can be. 

I am a farmer,
I've got a story to tell,
So listen up now,
I'm as mad as........

Well, I am a farmer's wife,
You can plainly see;
I am a farmer's wife,
Black as I can be.

I am a farmer's wife,
We've got a story to tell,
So listen up now,
We're mad as......

REFRAIN

Well, Mr. Gov'ment man,
What's a wrong with me?
Is it that my skin is Black,
Why you're mistreatin' me?

So, Mr. Gov'ment man,
I don't want it all,
Just want my share,
Like those white folks there. 

I am a farmer's child,
You can plainly see.
I am a farmer's child,
Black as I can be.

I am a farmer's child,
We've got a story to tell,
So listen up now,
We're mad as......

REFRAIN 

Well, Mr. Justice man,
What's a wrong with us,
Is it that our skin is Black,
Why you're mistreating us?

So, Mr. Justice man,
We don't want it all,
Just want our share,
Like those white folks there.

I am a farmer's friend,
As you can plainly see,
I am a farmer's friend,
White as I can be.

I am a farmer's friend,
They've got a story to tell,
So, listen up now,
We're mad as.......

REFRAIN

Well, Mr. President,
What's a wrong with them? 
Is it 'cause their skin is Black,
Why you're mistreating them? 

So, Mr. President,
They don't want it all,
Just want their share,
Like those white folks there.

So, Mr. Gov'ment man,
When can we talk?
So, Mr. Justice man,
You gonna make us walk? 

So, Mr. President,
When's it going to end?
So, Mr. President,
When will the change begin? 

I am a farmer,
As you can plainly see, 
Yes, my skin is Black,
Black as I can be. 

I'm gonna work this land
Just as long as I can
Gonna work these fields
Until I can't.

REFRAIN

So, Mr. Gov'ment man,
When can we talk?
So, Mr. Gov'ment man,
You gonna make us walk? 

So, Mr. President,
When's it goin' to end?
So, Mr. President,
When will the change begin? 

Just want my share,
Like those white folks there.
Just want my share,
Like those white folks there.
Just want my share,
Like those white folks there.

*Copyright Waymon Hinson


Monday, July 10, 2023

Call Me a Skeptic: USDA and Funding for Discrimination

Call me a skeptic if you wish. It seems that we have been down this road before. The terrain looks terribly familiar and the potholes, they look pretty much the same. 

Many of us are familiar with the machinations of Pigford I and then Pigford II. Though Pigford I was  class action suit back in 1999 under the direction of Judge Friedman, it contained a lot of money, a lot of lawyers, and restrictions that made things maddening for Black farmers. For instance, class counsel on the one hand waived discovery, but yet made off like a bandit in terms of money for their services. Again, the demand for Black farmers was to find a "similarly situated" white farmer with whom to compare and contrast so that racism could be proved. Whoever heard and that and who would ever agree to such a requirement? Billions of dollars were paid out to lawyers and to farmers. Most farmers I know wanted debt relief, not the promise of the $50K plus tax relief if settled under Track A or an undetermined amount if settled under Track B. What they wanted was to be relieved from the onerous burden of debt which had been demanded of them despite it being the fault of someone else. Only 371 Black farmers out of 16K actually received debt relief. 

Yes, we've been down this road before. 

Back a few years ago, we thought all was to be settled under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. I wrote about that. You can check that out here. No need to repeat the same words. The promise of 100% of debt relief plus 20% for taxes was halted in two courts across the land as a result of white farmers saying that they deserved some of that money, too. The key here is "slow walking" and big bank involvement. There is a lawsuit in federal court about these matters. 

Then, President Biden signs the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Again, I wrote a few words about that to President Biden, complete with political satire. You can find them here. No need to repeat them here. Bottom line? White farmers got debt relief as did Hispanic, Asian, and Native Americans, but not Black farmers. That was to have been done out of the $3.1B congress appropriated. We know of eleven or so Black farmers who were relieved of their debts. Eleven out of some 2,900 who have loans with USDA? We have moved from Black to Socially Disadvantaged and now to "distressed producers." Who would not qualify? 

Now comes the final focus. Precisely $2.2B has been allocated to those who can prove that they have been discriminated against. I have attended three Zoom calls with the USDA and the Federation of Southern Cooperatives. Here is a brief summation. 

The web page is now up and running. Check in here for complete details here for the announcement and check in here for next steps

Here are a few points of summary:  1) prove you have been discriminated against by filling out required or optional forms, or by supplying them to the hub; 2) a national entity is in charge of it all (is this even legal?); 3) work via one of two hubs in whichever region you reside (they are found in the links above); 4) feel free to get free advise from one of eight "cooperators" that are also found above; 5) this is a free process, so do not go and hire an attorney, but if you do, their fees are your responsibility; 6) the documents may be submitted via portal or copies at a local FSA office; 7) the list of documents required and/or requested is quite lengthy, so get started now; the deadline for submission is October 31; 8) this is not a first come first serve process; 9) all documents of all those who submit will be evaluated and the entity in charge will decide how much you are to receive; 10) the limit for payments is $500K; 11) per the Zoom calls, do not expect anything close to that; 12) the final word is the final word, i.e., there is no appeals process as what you receive is what you receive; 13) this is not a lawsuit process but a compensation model; 14) there are several law firms out in cyberspace wanting your business, for a fee of course, and 15) white farmers' claims have diluted the pool of potential funding. 

There are several potholes in this process. First, if you trust the USDA, do not get legal counsel, but if you do not trust USDA, you might get legal counsel, or you might consider trusting one of the "cooperator" groups, if you see one that you trust, or if you know someone affiliated with them that you trust. 

The most eggregious aspect of the process is that there is no appeals process. Coupled with that, an outside entity decides what your compensation will be. What is offered is the bottom line. Accept it or reject it. I have yet to hear of a complicated process like this that does not have an embedded appezls process. 

I have reviewed the materials. It all looks complicated to me. It is described as a simple do it yourself model. Perhaps it will be simple for many. 

The biggest grief I have with the process is that it was designed back in the day to attempt to level the playing field, one in which white farmers had all of the advantages and Black farmers received less than they deserved. How level is the playing field when Black farmers have lost land and productivity on the land from 1920 to 1997 to the tune of $326B

So, the world is changing. The Supreme Court has ruled out affirmative action. It looks like similar processes are playing out at USDA. 

And, they ask us to trust them? 

I think we've been down this road before. 


Tuesday, July 4, 2023

What is the 4th of July for Me and Those to Whom I am Committed?

Over on my oldest son's Facebook page, he wrote this this morning. I have seen it before. Seems that he posts it on July 4 each year. 

"July 4, 1776: The Declaration of Independence was adopted by the Continental Congress.

July 4, 1837: The first Chickasaw removal party, forced from their lands by the Indian Removal Act of 1830, arrived at Memphis, Tennessee, and were ferried across the Mississippi River into Arkansas, never to see the land of their ancestors again.

July 4, 2023: As usual, I'm struck by the intense, biting irony. A day of celebration and a day of dispossession rolled into one."

Then we can add January 1, 1863. 

Then we can add June 19, 1865. 

Earlier this week I posted on my own Facebook page these words: 

"You are sending a message to your community when you close your office, church or otherwise, for July 4th, but not June 19th. Maybe more than one message." 

Many passed right on by, but a few resonated with the comment. 

And then, I could not help but recall Frederick Douglass' famous speech from July 5, 1853 in his adopted hometown of Rochester, New York, entitled, "What to the Slave Is the 4th of July?" The entirety of that short speech is found here. 

Here is one pithy statement in large print and bolded because it is important:  

"Fellow-citizens; above your national, tumultuous joy, I hear the mournful wail of millions! whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday, are, to-day, rendered more intolerable by the jubilee shouts that reach them. If I do forget, if I do not faithfully remember those bleeding children of sorrow this day, “may my right hand forget her cunning, and may my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth!” To forget them, to pass lightly over their wrongs, and to chime in with the popular theme, would be treason most scandalous and shocking, and would make me a reproach before God and the world. My subject, then fellow-citizens, is American slavery. I shall see, this day, and its popular characteristics, from the slave’s point of view. Standing, there, identified with the American bondman, making his wrongs mine, I do not hesitate to declare, with all my soul, that the character and conduct of this nation never looked blacker to me than on this 4th of July! Whether we turn to the declarations of the past, or to the professions of the present, the conduct of the nation seems equally hideous and revolting. America is false to the past, false to the present, and solemnly binds herself to be false to the future. Standing with God and the crushed and bleeding slave on this occasion, I will, in the name of humanity which is outraged, in the name of liberty which is fettered, in the name of the constitution and the Bible, which are disregarded and trampled upon, dare to call in question and to denounce, with all the emphasis I can command, everything that serves to perpetuate slavery—the great sin and shame of America! “I will not equivocate; I will not excuse;” I will use the severest language I can command; and yet not one word shall escape me that any man, whose judgment is not blinded by prejudice, or who is not at heart a slaveholder, shall not confess to be fight and just. But I fancy I hear some one of my audience say, it is just in this circumstance that you and your brother abolitionists fail to make a favorable impression on the public mind. Would you argue more, and denounce less, would you persuade more, and rebuke less, your cause would be much more likely to succeed. But, I submit, where all is plain there is nothing to be argued. What point in the anti-slavery creed would you have me argue? On what branch of the subject do the people of this country need light? Must I undertake to prove that the slave is a man? That point is conceded already. Nobody doubts it. The slaveholders themselves acknowledge it in the enactment of laws for their government. They acknowledge it when they punish disobedience on the part of the slave. There are seventy-two crimes in the State of Virginia, which, if committed by a black man, (no matter how ignorant he be), subject him to the punishment of death; while only two of the same crimes will subject a white man to the like punishment. What is this but the acknowledgement that the slave is a moral, intellectual and responsible being? The manhood of the slave is conceded. It is admitted in the fact that Southern statute books are covered with enactments forbidding, under severe fines and penalties, the teaching of the slave to read or to write. When you can point to any such laws, in reference to the beasts of the field, then I may consent to argue the manhood of the slave. When the dogs in your streets, when the fowls of the air, when the cattle on your hills, when the fish of the sea, and the reptiles that crawl, shall be unable to distinguish the slave from a brute, their will I argue with you that the slave is a man!"

And then I wonder about today. I see all of the trappings of white American celebrating with BBQ cook outs, baseball games, and fireworks. 

I am left to wonder, how many of white American are reflecting upon America's call for freedom for all, all races, all genders, all colors, all creeds, all nationalities, or deep in our hearts do we assume that American is just for us, those of us who are anglo saxons, white, whatever color white actually is. 

Is today for whom? Is it also for those red-lined across town, those whose medical care is insufficient compared to mine, those who opt not to see an MD before it's too late, or those whose wages are inferior to mine despite similar levels of education? In short, is America, is July 4th, for those who pay the Black Tax to live in our country? 

Is the 4th of July for those who ancestors walked the Trail of Tears, who were relocated by the federal government to lands that looked nothing like their land? 

Is the 4th of July really for Black farmers of our land, those who have had their land stolen by the machinations and malfeasance of the USDA, those who have had white people lurking about looking to snag it at the lowest price? Remember Eddie and Dorothy Wise? They are two giants, legends, if you will, who typify what I'm talking about. Is the 4th of July for Black farmers who just want to work the land? Those who are holding on, those who are now 1.4% of American's farmers, those who hold some 4.5M acres when once they owned over 19M acres? 

The 4th of July is a complicated day. Some of us just walk on past it. Others of us stop and ponder. 

So, on this day, following a week in which the Supreme Court of the US, perhaps one of the most crooked courts ever in our country, some of whom ascended via affirmative action, have worked to deny others the same privilege. The same court that has decided that some get discriminated against and others don't. When is a cake a cake and when is a web page a web page a web page? When do people really get to make their own choices about medical care and who to love? 

Yes, there are many of us for whom July 4th is a day of conflict. Some of us celebrate all they way from June 19 to July 4th. May our Great God grant us wisdom and courage for the living of these days.