Lots
of things I ponder. I remember Charity Kenyoza from Malawi teasing me about my “pondering,”but he called it more like “pawndering.” We laughed. He was correct about his
new friend.
I am
pondering the current political scene, who’s who in DC, especially in and
around the White House and its current resident. I am pondering you dear
reader, and I am pondering me.
It
was Dr. Richard Schwartz who developed a meta-framework for our internal system, or our “parts,” and how they are organized in all of their lovely
complexity. We are hopefully more often than not led by our “core self,” the
self that loves, perceives, is balanced, compassionate, and in touch with the
bigger picture of things, the aspect of our true selves that leads almost
effortlessly at times. Then, we have our “manager parts,” those parts that
attempt to control, avoiding pain and suffering, that would rather tamp things
down rather than bringing them out in full force. Then we have our “exiles,” those parts of us
that feel shame, hurt, abandonment, rejection, and deep woundedness. Then, we
have our “fire-fighter” parts, those that are good at creating distractions
when the focus is too much on pain. Those parts can be impulsive, erratic,
intense, and can set one distraction after another when the “manager parts” are
losing control.
A
therapist has to do a skillful job of negotiating those parts and their
internal complexity. Oftentimes, we have to negotiate with the “manager” parts
in order to get to the pain of the “exile” parts and we have to put up with relational
shenanigans upon putting focus upon the “fire-fighter” parts.
You
and I both know, and perhaps you and I are some of those that we actually know,
who support and defend the president*. I do not doubt that good people support
him and his policies for good reasons. While I may think they are misguided,
you or they may think that they are well-founded.
The president* is a parts-led president. Look at his tweets. They are often
emotionally unhinged, erratic, angry, spiteful, full of rage, full of denial,
and self-promoting and all. We could spend all day on a deconstruction of his character,
his parts, and his policies. Most curious is his ability to allow his own “fire-fighter”
parts to create diversions when things are getting too hot, or too close to home.
But that is another story. For more information on this theme, check out
Woodward’s book, “Fear.” It describes a parts-led White House, staff, and
president*.
I am
most curious about how good Americans support this man and his causes. He is
mean-spirited and insults all manner of people. Women, minorities, politicians,
and others do not escape his wrath. His hell-bent for power tactics on the
world stage are bankrupting our farmers as well as the auto industry and
others.
Still,
30% of our country support him. Note that this is not a majority of us, but
only a minority that is vocal and defensive in posturing toward him. Many of this group I know. They are friends. They are family. They are good people. They are devout, god-fearing people. However, I am dismayed at what I observe to be the distinctions between their well-lived lives and their not-so-well-lived life of the president and his policies they support.
Are
we self-led or parts-led in our defense of him? Are we well balanced in our
assessment or are we blind to his flaws? How is our theology dancing along with
our political sensibilities?
When
we assert that he is God’s anointed, self-led or parts led?
When
we assert that he is making American great again, self-led or parts led?
When
we assert that he is an astute business man, self-led or parts led?
When
we assert that the economy is going great, self-led or parts led?
When
we assert that he is bringing back greater respect for America on the world
stage, self-led or parts led?
When
we assert that he is going the right thing by engaging us in an economic battle
around tariffs and China, self-led or parts-led?
When
we observe the number of areas of his administration that are being
investigated, self-led or parts-led?
When
we observe his family members in the WH as well as his businesses benefitting
as he is in the WH, self-led or parts-led?
When we observe the goings on the border (or is it "boarder"), displaced families and children, death of young children, and disenfranchisement of those asylum-seekers, self-led or parts-led?
When
we ignore his racist, sexist, homophobic, insults of all manner of citizens of
the US and the world, self-led or parts-led?
When
we certain that he is getting America back to being a Christian nation, saying “Merry
Christmas,” and functioning at did King Cyrus as God’s anointed, self-led or
parts-led?
When
we are dismayed at his leadership, policies, treatment of people, his
followers, and our own internal and external responses to them, self-led or
parts-led? That is a topic for another post.
Just
asking for a friend.
This is like a quiz where the answer is always B! I am also dismayed and sad. When will we choose a president who leads with heart and also employs logic? When will we choose a president who surrounds him/herself with people who are brilliant (lots of those out there) and who understand compassion (fewer of those)? When will we choose a president who knows how to lead by example? That's the leader I am looking for.
ReplyDeleteThank you for weighing in on the post. Yes, as a former academician, this is a poor illustration of an exam! However, it does touch the point about how parts-led politicians can make parts-led decisions, and how we, the people, are left hanging in the balance. Also I was attempting to raise the notion of how our own internal parts are magnified and perturbed through the onslaught of these day to day, moment to moment, and tweet to tweet information.
ReplyDelete